Transcatheter Heart Valve Thrombosis: Incidence, Predictors, and Clinical Outcomes

Register or Login to View PDF Permissions
Permissions× For commercial reprint enquiries please contact Springer Healthcare:

For permissions and non-commercial reprint enquiries, please visit to start a request.

For author reprints, please email
Average (ratings)
No ratings
Your rating


Since its initial approval, the number of transcatheter aortic valve replacement procedures performed has increased exponentially with evolving indications that now include patients at intermediate risk for perioperative mortality following surgery. Multiple studies and reports have observed the phenomenon of leaflet dysfunction and thrombosis on follow-up imaging that may be associated with serious adverse outcomes. This review provides an insight into the incidence, predictors, management, and follow-up of transcatheter heart valve thrombosis.

Disclosure:The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.



Correspondence Details:Ankur Kalra, MD, FACP, FACC, FSCAI, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Harrington Heart & Vascular Institute, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Ave, Mailstop LKS 5038, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA. E:

Copyright Statement:

The copyright in this work belongs to Radcliffe Medical Media. Only articles clearly marked with the CC BY-NC logo are published with the Creative Commons by Attribution Licence. The CC BY-NC option was not available for Radcliffe journals before 1 January 2019. Articles marked ‘Open Access’ but not marked ‘CC BY-NC’ are made freely accessible at the time of publication but are subject to standard copyright law regarding reproduction and distribution. Permission is required for reuse of this content.

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a recent innovation that has transformed the care of patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis. It has emerged as an alternative for surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in prohibitive-, high-risk, and more recently, intermediate-risk surgical patients. More than 200,000 TAVRs have been performed in 65 countries around the world.1

As for surgical valves, transcatheter heart valve (THV) thrombosis is a rare, but serious, clinical adverse event with reported mortality rates reaching 30 %.2 Multiple reports and studies have shed light on the incidence of THV leaflet thrombosis. This article summarizes the current and evolving literature on the incidence, predictors, and clinical outcomes of THV thrombosis.

Transcatheter Heart Valve Thrombosis: Emerging Concerns

THV-reduced leaflet mobility was first described by Makkar et al. in patients enrolled in the Portico Re-sheathable Transcatheter Aortic Valve System US Investigational Device Exemption (PORTICO IDE) trial, and the Assessment of Transcatheter and Surgical Aortic Bioprosthetic Valve Thrombosis and Its Treatment with Anticoagulation (RESOLVE) and Subclinical Aortic Valve Bioprosthesis Thrombosis Assessed with Four-Dimensional Computed Tomography (SAVORY) registries.3 Patients underwent a dedicated 4D, volume-rendered computed tomography (CT) scan at different time intervals post TAVR with reduced leaflet motility ranging from 13 to 40 %. Although the study was underpowered for clinical outcomes, several important findings were described: (i) the incidence of stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) was higher in patients with reduced leaflet mobility (18 % versus 1 %; p=0.007); (ii) patients on therapeutic anticoagulation with warfarin had a lower incidence of reduced leaflet mobility compared with patients on dual antiplatelet therapy (0 % versus 51 %; p=0.007); and (iii) therapeutic anticoagulation completely resolved the CT finding of reduced leaflet mobility.

In a retrospective analysis of 4,266 consecutive patients who underwent TAVR with Edwards Sapien/Sapien XT (Edwards Lifesciences) and Medtronic CoreValve (Medtronic, Inc.) in 12 centers, Latib et al. reported 26 patients with valve thrombosis, defined as valve dysfunction in addition to either histopathology or an imaging modality demonstrating evidence for thrombosis, or an appropriate hemodynamic response to anticoagulation, restoring normal prosthetic valve function within 2 months of therapy.4 The incidence of clinically significant leaflet thrombosis was reported as 0.61 % in this large multicenter registry, with the majority of patients presenting with worsening dyspnea (65 %) and having increased transvalvular gradients (92 %).4

A recent report from The Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database revealed 30 cases of structural valve dysfunction due to leaflet thrombosis (Edwards Sapien = 20; CoreValve = 10) out of the 5,691 TAVR-related adverse events.

Clinical Versus Subclinical Transcatheter Heart Valve Thrombosis

Clinically significant THV thrombosis manifests as either heart failure or stroke or TIA, and has been associated with adverse clinical events, including cardiogenic shock in 6.7 % of cases and death in 10.7–30.0 % of cases.2,4,5

Subclinical THV thrombosis is diagnosed if there is either an increase in transaortic mean gradient on follow-up studies by 10 mmHg or direct visualization of thrombus on the leaflets; or a CT scan identifying reduced leaflet motility along with hypoattenuated leaflet thickening are documented on cardiovascular imaging in the absence of the aforementioned clinical manifestations, followed by resolution of imaging findings following a course of anticoagulation. Interpretable CT scans (from 890 patients) in RESOLVE and SAVORY registries identified subclinical THV thrombosis in 106 patients; normal leaflet motion was restored in 31 patients after initiation of anticoagulation.6

Hypoattenuated Leaflet Thickening Versus Hypoattenuation Affecting Motion As Predictors of Thrombosis

An important distinction in the natural history of progression of THV leaflet thrombosis is the imaging characteristic of the valve, and its implication on prognosis and clinical outcomes. As noted in earlier studies, hypoattenuated leaflet thickening (HALT) observed on CT scans performed post implantation was not a rare finding, and was dependent on post-procedural antithrombotic therapy. In a study evaluating Edwards Sapien 3 transcatheter aortic valves on post-TAVR CT scans (median 5 days), HALT was noted in 10.3 % of asymptomatic patients, with near resolution after anticoagulation.7 In another study with longer-term follow-up of Edwards Sapien XT valves, multi-detector CT scans identified HALT in 1.4 % of patients at discharge, 10 % at 6 months, and 14.3 % at 1 year.8

In their analysis from the SAVORY registry that included patients undergoing both TAVR (n=75) and SAVR (n=30), Søndergaard et al. identified HALT in 38.1 % and hypoattenuation affecting motion (HAM) in 20.2 %.9 Of these, progression was identified in 15.5 % of patients, and regression in 10.7 %. Progression was less likely in patients on vitamin-K antagonists (VKA) and other forms of oral anticoagulants (OR 0.014; P=0.036). The investigators postulated that subclinical leaflet thrombosis is a common finding after both TAVR and SAVR, and may progress from normal leaflet motion to HALT, to the more severe HAM, at variable intervals after valve implantation. Evaluating population-specific risk factors, Midha et al. analyzed data from patients in the RESOLVE registry, excluding patients on anticoagulation.10 The analysis concluded that: (i) Edwards Sapien 3 valves that were 10 % over-expanded (per diameter) had a higher propensity toward developing a thrombus; and (ii) CoreValve Evolut R valve implantation depth correlated with increased thrombus volume. In another analysis of a multicenter registry that included 1,521 patients, valve hemodynamic deterioration (VHD) was present in 4.5 % of the cohort during follow-up where multiple risk factors were identified to be independent predictors of VHD.11 These risk factors included: the absence of anticoagulant therapy at hospital discharge, a valve-in-valve (TAVR in a surgical valve) procedure, the use of a 23-mm valve, and a higher body mass index.

Management of Clinical and Subclinical Transcatheter Heart Valve Thrombosis

In the study by Latib et al., the vast majority of patients with subclinical THV thrombosis were treated conservatively with anticoagulation with improved transvalvular gradients on follow-up echocardiography.4 There was a reduction in transaortic mean gradient from 41.9 to 16.9 mmHg after a median of 39 days of therapeutic anticoagulation.

Similarly, for HALT and HAM that were identified on follow-up CT scans, there was regression of HAM and improved leaflet motion after anticoagulation in the study by Søndergaard et al.9 The initiation of anticoagulation (either warfarin or direct oral anticoagulants) was effective in restoration of normal leaflet function in 100 % in patients with HALT and HAM, where dual antiplatelet therapy failed to do so with progression or persistence of leaflet motion abnormality in the absence of anticoagulation.

The current European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) guidelines for the management of bioprosthetic valve thrombosis recommend treatment with a VKA and/or unfractionated heparin before reintervention.12

Valve Imaging Post Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

There is no consensus with regard to imaging modality of choice and frequency for valve imaging post TAVR. The current ESC guidelines recommend imaging after TAVR or SAVR with a transthoracic echocardiogram to be routinely performed within 30 days to establish baseline valve function, another echocardiogram 1 year after implantation, and annually thereafter.12

HALT and HAM identified on CT imaging as primordial forms of leaflet thrombosis were associated with only mild increase in transvalvular gradients.7,13 Relying completely on echocardiography alone may therefore be a challenge. In cases reported from the MAUDE database, the occurrence of leaflet thrombosis was highest in the first year post implant, suggesting that a closer follow-up with advanced imaging at least in the first year post procedure may be of high clinical value.


  1. Vahl TP, Kodali SK, Leon MB. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement 2016: a modern-day ‘through the looking-glass’ adventure. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016;67:1472–87.
    Crossref | PubMed
  2. Hafiz AM, Kalra A, Ramadan R, et al. Clinical or symptomatic leaflet thrombosis following transcatheter aortic valve replacement: insights from the U.S. FDA MAUDE Database. Structural Heart 2017;1:256–64.
  3. Makkar RR, Fontana G, Sondergaard L. Possible subclinical leaflet thrombosis in bioprosthetic aortic valves. N Engl J Med 2016;374:1591–2.
    Crossref | PubMed
  4. Latib A, Naganuma T, Abdel-Wahab M, et al. Treatment and clinical outcomes of transcatheter heart valve thrombosis. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2015;8:pii: e001779.
    Crossref | PubMed
  5. Hansson NC, Grove EL, Andersen HR, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve thrombosis: incidence, predisposing factors, and clinical implications. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016;68:2059–69.
    Crossref | PubMed
  6. Chakravarty T, Sondergaard L, Friedman J, et al. Subclinical leaflet thrombosis in surgical and transcatheter bioprosthetic aortic valves: an observational study. Lancet 2017;389:2383–92.
    Crossref | PubMed
  7. Pache G, Schoechlin S, Blanke P, et al. Early hypo-attenuated leaflet thickening in balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic heart valves. Eur Heart J 2016;37:2263–71.
    Crossref | PubMed
  8. Yanagisawa R, Hayashida K, Yamada Y, et al. Incidence, predictors, and mid-term outcomes of possible leaflet thrombosis after TAVR. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2016;pii: S1936-878X(16)30897-X.
    Crossref | PubMed
  9. Sondergaard L, De Backer O, Kofoed KF, et al. Natural history of subclinical leaflet thrombosis affecting motion in bioprosthetic aortic valves. Eur Heart J 2017;38:2201–7.
    Crossref | PubMed
  10. Midha PA, Raghav V, Sharma R, et al. The fluid mechanics of transcatheter heart valve leaflet thrombosis in the neo-sinus. Circulation 2017;136:1598–609.
    Crossref | PubMed
  11. Del Trigo M, Munoz-Garcia AJ, Wijeysundera HC, et al. Incidence, timing, and predictors of valve hemodynamic deterioration after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: multicenter registry.
    J Am Coll Cardiol 2016;67:644–55.
    Crossref | PubMed
  12. Baumgartner H, Falk V, Bax JJ, et al. 2017 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J 2017;38:2739–91.
    Crossref | PubMed
  13. Vollema EM, Kong WKF, Katsanos S, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve thrombosis: the relation between hypo-attenuated leaflet thickening, abnormal valve haemodynamics, and stroke. Eur Heart J 2017;38:1207–17.
    Crossref | PubMed